Assessment Criteria for Critiquing Research Designs and Reports

Introduction

In this assessment criteria, the focus is on the ability of the student to apply theoretical knowledge, critique research designs and reports, and produce reports, literature reviews, and seminars that reflect a deep understanding of the subject matter. The assessment will also evaluate the student's ability to find pertinent literature, consolidate knowledge into coherent writing with insightful conclusions, and present their work in an acceptable standard of technical correctness, literacy style, and presentation.

Assessment Components

The assessment will include both summative and formative procedures to ensure that the purpose of the qualification is achieved. The following components will be considered:

1. Application of Theoretical Knowledge:

   • The student should demonstrate a strong understanding of theoretical concepts related to research designs and reports.
   • The student should be able to apply theoretical knowledge to critique research designs effectively.

2. Critique of Research Designs and Reports:

   • The student should be able to critically evaluate the strengths and weaknesses of research designs and reports.
   • The critique should be supported by relevant literature and examples.

3. Production of Reports, Literature Reviews, and Seminars:

   • The student should be able to produce well-structured reports, literature reviews, and seminars that reflect a deep understanding of the topic.
   • The work should be coherent, insightful, and demonstrate the ability to synthesize information effectively.

4. Finding Pertinent Literature:

   • The student should demonstrate proficiency in conducting literature searches to find relevant sources.
   • The sources should be credible, up-to-date, and contribute to the overall argument presented.

5. Coherent Writing and Insightful Conclusions:

   • The student's writing should be clear, coherent, and well-organized.
   • The conclusions drawn should be insightful, logical, and supported by evidence from the literature.

6. Technical Correctness, Literacy Style, and Presentation:

   • The student's work should adhere to academic writing standards in terms of grammar, punctuation, and referencing.
   • The literacy style should be appropriate for the target audience.
   • The presentation of work should be professional, with attention to detail in formatting and layout.

7. Oral Presentations:

   • Oral presentations should be academic in nature, with a clear structure and logical flow of ideas.
   • Appropriate visual aids should be used to enhance understanding.
   • The presentation should be engaging, well-rehearsed, and demonstrate the student's knowledge of the topic.

8. Integrated Assessment:

   • Summative and formative assessments should be integrated to ensure a comprehensive evaluation of the student's progress.
   • Different assessment methods, such as coursework, assignments, essays, seminars, literature reviews, group projects, oral presentations, tests, and examinations, should be used to assess various skills and competencies.

Conclusion

In conclusion, the assessment criteria outlined above aim to evaluate the student's ability to critically engage with research designs and reports, apply theoretical knowledge, and produce high-quality academic work. By incorporating a variety of assessment methods and criteria, the qualification's purpose of developing a deep understanding of research methodologies and reporting practices will be effectively achieved.