Bachelor of Engineering Technology Honours in Chemical Engineering

Associated Assessment Criteria for Exit Level Outcome 1:

• Analyse and define the problem and identify an acceptable solution.
• Identify relevant information and engineering knowledge and skills for solving the problem.
• Generate and formulate possible approaches that would lead to a workable solution for the problem.
• Analyse and model possible solutions.
• Evaluate possible solutions and select the best solution.
• Formulate and present the solution in an appropriate form.

Associated Assessment Criteria for Exit Level Outcome 2:

• Apply an appropriate mix of knowledge of mathematics, numerical analysis, statistics, natural science and engineering science at a fundamental level and in a specialist area for the solution of complex engineering problems.
• Utilise theories, principles and laws.
• Perform modelling and formal analysis on engineering materials, components, systems or processes.
• Communicate concepts, ideas and theories.
• Reason about and conceptualise engineering materials, components, systems or processes.
• Perform work within the boundaries of the practice area.

Associated Assessment Criteria for Exit Level Outcome 3:

• Formulate the design problem to satisfy user needs, applicable standards, codes of practice and legislation.
• Plan and manage the design process to focus on important issues and recognise and deal with constraints.
• Acquire and evaluate knowledge, information and resources in order to apply appropriate principles and design tools to provide a workable solution.
• Perform design tasks including analysis, quantitative modelling and optimisation of the product, system or process subject to the relevant premises, assumptions, constraints and restrictions.
• Evaluate alternatives for implementation and select a preferred solution based on techno-economic analysis and judgement.
• Assess the selected design in terms of the social, economic, legal, health, safety, and environmental impact and benefits.
• Communicate the design logic and relevant information in a technical report.

Associated Assessment Criteria for Exit Level Outcome 4:

• Plan and conduct investigations and experiments within an appropriate discipline.
• Search available literature and critically evaluate material is for suitability to the investigation.
• Perform necessary analysis for the investigation.
• Select equipment or software appropriately use in the investigations.
• Analyse, interpret and derive information from available data.
• Draw conclusions from an analysis of all available evidence.
• Record the purpose, process and outcomes of the investigation in a technical report or research project report.

Associated Assessment Criteria for Exit Level Outcome 5:

• Assess the method, skill or tool for applicability and limitations against the required result.
• Correctly apply the method, skill or tool to achieve the required result.
• Examine results produced by the method, skill or tool and assessed against required results.
• Create, select and use computer applications as required by the discipline.

Associated Assessment Criteria for Exit Level Outcome 6:

• Use appropriate structure, style and language of written and oral communication for the purpose of communication and the target audience.
• Use appropriate and effective graphics in enhancing the meaning of text.
• Use visual materials to enhance oral communications.
• Use accepted methods for providing information to others involved in the engineering activity.
• Fluently deliver oral communication keeping the intended meaning.

Associated Assessment Criteria for Exit Level Outcome 7:

• Explain the impact of technology in terms of the benefits and limitations to society.
• Analyse the engineering activity in terms of the impact on public and occupational health and safety.
• Analyse the engineering activity in terms of the impact on the physical environment.
• Make considerations on personal, social, economic, cultural values and requirements for those who are affected by engineering activities.

Associated Assessment Criteria for Exit Level Outcome 8:

• Explain the principles of planning, organising, leading and controlling.
• Carry out individual work effectively, strategically and on time.
• Contribute to team activities, including at disciplinary boundaries, to support the output of the team as a whole.
• Demonstrate functionality as a team leader.
• Organise and manage a design or research project.
• Carry out effective communication in the context of individual or team work.

Associated Assessment Criteria for Exit Level Outcome 9:

• Manage learning tasks autonomously and ethically, individually and in learning groups.
• Reflect on learning undertaken and determine own learning requirements and strategies to suit personal learning style and preferences.
• Source, organise and evaluate relevant information.
• Comprehend and apply knowledge acquired outside of formal instruction.
• Critically challenge assumptions and embrace new thinking.

Associated Assessment Criteria for Exit Level Outcome 10:

• Describe the nature and complexity of ethical dilemmas.
• Describe the ethical implications of decisions made.
• Apply ethical reasoning to evaluate engineering solutions.
• Maintain continued competence is maintained through keeping abreast of up-to-date tools and techniques available in the workplace.
• Understand and embrace the system of continuing professional development as an ongoing process.
• Accept responsibility for consequences stemming from own actions.
• Make judgements in decision making during problem-solving and justify designs.
• Limit decision-making to the area of current competence.

Integrated Assessment:

Formative Assessment: Different forms of formative assessments will apply such as project reports, case studies, assignments etc. Feedback on assignments is returned to the learners within reasonable time, project presentations are scheduled in order for the instructor to provide comments, etc. These progress assessments are done by the module instructor. However, the final examination will require the involvement of a suitable external examiner, who will be requested to approve the module examination paper and mark grading provided by the module instructor. No experiential learning is involved in the qualification.

Summative Assessment: For the modules, each intermediate or progress assessment will be awarded a mark, which will be combined with the final examination mark based on pre-determined weightings for the module. For the Research Report component, two assessors will be required, one of whom will be an internal assessor (a full-time academic staff of the institution) and the other, an external assessor. The assessors are appointed by the Faculty on the basis of their scholarship and expertise. The recommendations of the external assessor are received at the Faculty and transmitted to the learner's supervisor for further consideration: comments, corrections or improvements. All modules are moderated externally.